There is
currently, and will likely be for a good while, debate surrounding the
therapeutic use of cannabis and the chemical components which can be derived
from it. There are many cogent and rational arguments in support of the plant's
medicinal properties, and there are a couple of compelling reasons for allowing
people to choose this treatment path instead of any other. The biggest obstacle
facing the proponents of medical marijuana is a frustrating tangle of politics.
In the United
States of America, at least at a federal level, cannabis is illegal. It is
prohibited to grow, possess, sell, or buy the plant. Stiff penalties are
routinely imposed for nearly all infractions of this prohibition against the
plant.
Individual state
governments may have enacted their own legislation which decriminalizes or even
legalizes the substance, but federal law is still paramount if the matter comes
up. Generally speaking, federal agencies are neither equipped nor motivated to perform
state level law enforcement, and so states with less strict laws governing
cannabis are essentially safe places for patients.
At the root of
the problem is the perceived therapeutic value of cannabis. Everything hinges
upon the determination of actual medicinal benefit. The prohibition against
cannabis is codified in the Drug Enforcement Agency's scheduling of it, which
is based on the potential health benefits associated with a substance.
Some people take
issue with the scheduling and its results. They ask why cocaine and anabolic
steroids are considered to have greater medicinal value than cannabis. They
notice that the more proprietary and complicated the names get, the less of a
problem the Drug Enforcement Agency has with them. While this may be a bit of a
wild conspiracy theory to see some kind of collusion between the law
enforcement agencies and the major pharmaceutical companies, there are those
who maintain that something very much of that sort is going on.
So the knot is
tied. It is not possible to allow patients to choose cannabis as a treatment
option because the plant is illegal. The plant is illegal because it is
considered to have no significant medicinal value. There is research which
contradicts this claim, but it is not considered compelling enough evidence by
policy makers.
Interestingly
enough, the question of the legal status of cannabis may end up being resolved
for more economic and practical reasons. The social obstacle to mainstream
acceptance of cannabinoids is closely tied to the illicit nature of the plant.
This is a facet of the so called War On Drugs started many years ago and which
has proven incredibly expensive and completely ineffective. Abandoning this
"war" would ease everyone's problems, from the federal accountants to
the chemotherapy patients who just want to stop vomiting for a while.
As more and more
evidence mounts to counter the Drug Enforcement Agency's assertion that
cannabis has no medical benefit, public opinion changes. The states which have
enacted medical marijuana legislation have not degenerated into mindless, drug
addled chaos. There is a growing feeling that this movement is important and
compassionate, and that it will succeed in the end.
No comments:
Post a Comment